logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.03.18 2015고정372
업무방해
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the plaintiff, who is the plaintiff, the B apartment in Busan, and C is the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, and the plaintiff.

The Defendant, along with C, tried to interfere with construction by holding a meeting before the construction site on the ground that the aforementioned D Building and B apartment occupants suffered damages due to noise and dust, etc. due to the “E Apartment Construction” performed by the victim warning integrated construction corporation.

On November 7, 2014, from around 10:0 to 14:00, the Defendant obstructed the access of construction vehicles, such as C and other construction sites, while holding a meeting with 30 to 50 residents of B apartments, such as C, in the vicinity of the construction site of an apartment in Busan, the Defendant obstructed the access of construction vehicles, such as car, etc.

On November 14, 2014, from around 10:00 to around 15:00, the Defendant was holding a meeting with 30-50 residents of B including C, in the vicinity of the construction site, and obstructed the entry of construction vehicles, such as truck, by blocking the entrance of the construction site.

On November 15, 2014, from around 10:00 to around 15:00, the Defendant was holding a meeting with 30-50 residents of B including C, in the vicinity of the construction site, and obstructed the entry of construction vehicles, such as truck, by blocking the entrance of the construction site.

On November 18, 2014, from around 11:00 to around 14:50, the Defendant was holding a meeting with 30-50 residents of B including C, in the vicinity of the construction site, and obstructed the access of construction vehicles, such as truck, by blocking the entrance of the construction site.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with the above residents, such as C, and interfered with the victim's work by force over four occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to any nonexclusive assembly photograph, each report on outdoor assembly;

1. Relevant Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.

arrow