A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2016, at around 04:00, the Defendant intruded into a water tank warehouse "D operated by the victim C" in Seopopopopo City B, which was not corrected, and stolen the Defendant’s property worth KRW 27,000, total of KRW 27,000, the market price of the victim’s possession, which was kept in custody at that place, with the property equivalent to KRW 24,00,00, including KRW 60, market price of KRW 3,000, and KRW 3,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting off the scenes and CCTV closures;

1. Grounds for sentencing Article 330 of the Criminal Act with respect to the crime;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment for the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall be limited to the scope of the punishment [the scope of the punishment] for general property, where the area of mitigation (eight months to one year and six months) (the special mitigated person] intrudes into any place other than indoor residential space (the four types);

2. Determination of sentence: The Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after committing the instant crime, both criminal cases, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of the instant case are considered. In particular, considering the following circumstances, the Defendant, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Jeju District Court on June 29, 2015 and was sentenced to a two-year suspension of execution on July 7, 2015 due to the crime of forging signature at the Jeju District Court, was under the suspension of execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2015; however, the Defendant committed the instant crime while being under criminal trial due to intrusion upon structure at night, larceny, etc.; furthermore, the nature of the instant crime was extremely poor; further, the Defendant was subject to the punishment for each of the instant crimes, such as larceny and intrusion one time before committing the instant crime; the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment on several occasions, other than the punishment for each of the crimes, such as theft, theft, etc., which was punished once by a fine on one occasion.

(k) favorable circumstances: The fact that the defendant makes a confession of the crime of this case, and the value of the stolen damaged articles is not significant.