A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2016, from around 12:00 to around 13:00 on the same day, the Defendant infringed upon the victim’s residence by opening a bend window with no correction of the inside of the gas pipe and entering the room.

2. The Defendant: (a) carried out a thief’s 5 paper and stolen 700,000 won in cash owned by the victim at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) and (c) 20,000 won in cash within the low-amount f,00 won in the market price; and (d) f,000 won in 20,000 won in f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment (absent point, a choice of imprisonment), and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (absent point of intrusion upon residence and choice of imprisonment);

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of punishment recommended on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the mitigated area (from August to January to June) of the mitigated area (the special mitigated person] of general property;

2. The crime of this case, which committed the crime of this case, was committed by intrusion upon another person's residence and thus, the nature of the crime is not good. The defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to criminal punishment three times due to the same crime (one time of suspended execution, two times of fines), and that he did not recover from damage during the same suspended execution period, under the unfavorable circumstances, he committed the crime of this case, and recognized his mistake and reflects it, and that the crime of this case constitutes a living penalty shall be considered under favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined like the order, taking into account all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the age, sexual behavior, environment, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.