1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff obtained permission for occupancy and use of each of the following grounds: (a) on March 7, 2003, the occupancy and use period from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2007, on the aggregate of 9,893 square meters among the rivers B and C (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) in Naju-si, a river site owned by the State; and (b) on November 1, 201, the occupancy and use period from November 1, 201 to October 31, 201 (hereinafter “each of the instant occupancy and use permission”).

On August 24, 2011, the Defendant publicly announced a compensation plan to compensate land to be incorporated into “E district reservoir increase project for agricultural production infrastructure” under Article 2 subparag. 5 (b) of the Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act (hereinafter “instant project”), and all rights-related articles, etc., which falls under the agricultural infrastructure improvement project for agricultural production infrastructure under Article 2 subparag. 5 (b) of the Rearrangement of Agricultural

On January 5, 2012, Jeonnam Do governor publicly announced the implementation plan for the instant project to be expropriated and used by G workers in Naju, including each land of this case, as F for the notification of Jeonnam Do.

On November 20, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for the agricultural loss compensation with the Defendant. On the ground that each of the instant land was a closed-end area where no farming was conducted. On March 2014, the Plaintiff respondeded to the Defendant that the payment would not be made on March 11, 2014.

On June 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the local Land Tribunal for adjudication of compensation for farming loss, relocation expenses, and obstacle compensation, and on June 24, 2015, Jeonnam-do Local Land Tribunal dismissed all the above application for adjudication on June 24, 2015.

[Grounds for recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 5, 6, Eul evidence 11-2, plaintiff's assertion of the whole purport of argument, plaintiff's claim for compensation for farming loss, and plaintiff's claim for related Acts and subordinate statutes has cultivated each land of this case for 20 years after obtaining permission for occupation and use.