1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the buildings listed in the attached Table 2 list, each point is indicated with drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1;

There is no dispute between the parties as to the facts stated in the attached Table 1.

Therefore, as the lease contract concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was lawfully terminated, the Defendant, as the lessee, is obligated to provide the Plaintiff, who is the lessor, with the indication of drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 148.76 square meters in sequence among the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 2 list, and to pay rent or unjust enrichment calculated at the rate of KRW 3,217,50 per month from September 1, 2019 to September 1, 2019, and the sum of rent and public charges unpaid as of August 2019.

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff is the largest shareholder of the plaintiff, and the defendant plays a role in communication with the plaintiff's activities and members, and that the defendant's debt should be accumulated to proceed in liquidation or bankruptcy, and thus the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed. However, this argument cannot be viewed as a legitimate ground for defense against the plaintiff's claim for delivery of building and collection of unjust enrichment on the ground that the lease contract is terminated.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.