1. A notary public against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) of the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff No. 95, 2014.

1. Basic facts

2. All debts belonging to a corporation, such as a transport license, etc. which occurred not later than March 1 shall be the defendant's responsibility;

Provided, That all liabilities and responsibilities incurred after the sale of corporation and the succession of the representative director shall be borne by the plaintiff.

4. The instant legal entity is acquired by the Plaintiff and the acquisition price shall be KRW 140 million.

(The installment shall be succeeded by the Plaintiff). The down payment shall be KRW 20 million, the intermediate payment shall be KRW 50 million, the remainder shall be KRW 70 million.

7. The installment and other tax amount of a vehicle generated from March 1, 2014 are responsible for the Plaintiff.

9. The Plaintiff leased three vehicles to the Defendant by November 30, 2014 under mutual agreement, and the Defendant pays to the Plaintiff all installment payments, insurance premiums, and other expenses incurred in the leased vehicle.

The balance of the purchase price of KRW 70 million shall be paid up to March 30, 2014.

When violating the above contract, the offender shall pay twice the down payment as a breach amount.

(1) On March 6, 2014, the Plaintiff acquired a transport license, registered vehicle (attached Form) from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant corporation”) from the Plaintiff, etc. (hereinafter “instant transfer/acquisition agreement”), and the main content of the instant transfer/acquisition agreement is as follows.

The plaintiff paid KRW 73 million to the defendant under the same day down payment and intermediate payment.

B. On March 6, 2014, the Plaintiff issued a promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) with a face value of KRW 70 million, and the due date March 30, 2014, and as of March 6, 2014 (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) to secure the payment of any balance, and notarized the Plaintiff’s issuance of the said promissory note with a statement of acceptance of compulsory execution by the law firm notarial deeds No. 95, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as “notarial deeds of promissory notes in this case”). 【No dispute exists, entry in Gap’s 1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.”

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. The plaintiff's assertion (i.e., the plaintiff) of this case.