The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal in this case recognized that the victim was injured due to the traffic accident in this case, and it was necessary for the defendant to take measures to rescue the victim at the time of the traffic accident in this case and to ensure smooth traffic by preventing and removing traffic hazards and obstacles, and even though he had the intent to commit the crime of escape, the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts charged in this case on a different premise.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the court below’s reasoning, the victim suffered injury as shown in the facts charged only by the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

or the defendant was required to take measures such as aiding the victim at the time of the instant traffic accident.

In addition, it was necessary to take measures to ensure smooth traffic by preventing and removing traffic risks and obstacles caused by the instant traffic accident.

The fact-finding and decision of the court below that acquitted the charged facts of this case on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize that the defendant had a criminal intent to escape, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, are correct, and there is no error of mistake of facts as pointed out by the prosecutor

① According to the vehicle black image (Evidence Nos. 8 of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor), the Defendant’s vehicle was passing along the intersection while driving in two lanes. However, the victim’s vehicle driven in the three-lane, driving in the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, leaving the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and leaving the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle so that the Defendant’s vehicle shocked the victim’s vehicle.

당시 피고인의 차량과 피해자의 차량이 비스듬히 스치듯이 부딪혔고, 차량의 속도도 빠르지 않았으며 더욱이 앞서가던 피해자 차량의 속도가 더 빨랐으므로 추돌...