All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The accident of this case (the part concerning the crime of oil) is the back wheel part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s left right top part, and thus did not generate scatterings on the road. Since the victim E stops for a period of four to five seconds after the accident of this case, but drives normally to its original destination, the Defendant did not need to take measures to prevent and remove traffic risks and obstacles on the road to ensure safe and smooth traffic.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

(B) The defendant explicitly withdraws his claim on the grounds of unfair sentencing on the first day of the trial.

검사(이유 무죄 부분) 블랙박스 영상에 의하면 이 사건 사고 당시 피해자들이 놀라서 소리를 쳤고, 쿵 하는 소리와 함께 피해자 E의 차량이 왼쪽의 중앙선 부근으로 밀린 사실을 확인할 수 있을 정도로 사고 당시 충격이 상당하였으며, 교통사고는 그 특성상 시간이 지나서 상해 사실이 발견되는 경우가 많기 때문에 피해자들이 사고 직후 112에 인적 피해가 없었다고 신고하였어도 상해를 입었을 가능성이 있으므로 피해자들이 이 사건 사고로 인하여 상해를 입은 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

Therefore, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The purport of Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act regarding the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles is to ensure safe and smooth traffic by preventing and removing traffic risks and obstacles that occur on the road, and to recover the damage of the victim.