A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jung-gu District Court on April 29, 2016, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for ten months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 10, 2016 and is currently under suspended sentence.

[2018 Highest 75]

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On December 11, 2017, the Defendant ought to return to the Defendant “E”, which is managed by the victim D (V, 28 years old) located in Pyeongtaek-si C on December 201, 2017, without any reason, to the Defendant “ma”.

The victim interfered with the cosmetic business of the victim by force, such as inging sound back to the cosmetic, claiming tobacco to customers, keeping the cosmetic used by the victim back to the cosmetic for about 20 minutes, etc.

B. On January 10, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business for about 50 minutes, for about 50 minutes, such as 50 minutes of the disturbance, i.e., the victim G (66 years of age) in Pyeongtaek-si F, i.e., “H” in the restaurant operated by the victim G (66 years of age), i.e., the customer, without any reason, i., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

2. On January 2, 2018, the Defendant damaged the property by: (a) throwing out one plastic chairs equivalent to 5,000 won at the market price managed by the Victim K without any justifiable reason in front of the “J convenience store located in Pyeongtaek-si I” on the street, around 03:20 on January 2, 2018.

[2018 Highest 92]

1. On November 22, 2017, from around 13:00 to around 14:55, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by entering a restaurant while being drunk in the state of being drunk at the N cafeteria operated by the Plaintiff M of Pyeongtaek-si L (hereinafter the age of 44).

2. The Defendant’s fraud is set forth in paragraph 1.