All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendants of all the charges.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of crimes of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and assault.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on Defendant B, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable cannot be a legitimate ground for

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.