All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”) among the facts charged in the instant case and the violation of each of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (a similar act) on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “Intimidation” in the crime of violating the Juvenile Sex Protection Act (similar act) and the crime of violating the Juvenile Sex Protection Act.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

Defendant

In this case where a person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") is sentenced to a more minor punishment, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. The defendant's judgment on the case of the request for attachment order shall be deemed to have filed an appeal regarding the case of the request for attachment order as long as the defendant files an appeal against the prosecuted case.

However, there is no entry of the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal and there is no entry of the grounds of appeal in the appellate brief.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.