1. The resolution adopted by the Defendant on September 7, 2009 regarding the distribution of compensation for losses for the C fishery license in the new and newly-Naman-Naman City.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a fishing village fraternity established for the purpose of improving the productivity of fishermen and the implementation of joint projects to improve their living conditions, etc. with the area of the entire South-Naman-gun Dri District. The plaintiff is a member of the defendant's fraternity.

B. On July 7, 2003, the Defendant obtained a license for fisheries (hereinafter “instant fishery license”) from the head of the Newananan-gun, Maan-gun, Maan-gun to 26 E branch line 26 E branch line 1, from July 7, 2003, from July 7, 2003 to July 6, 2013, as well as from July 6, 2013.

C. The Plaintiff entered into an event contract with the Defendant on the instant fishing license, and operated the Kim Farming City at 10th of the 26th of the instant fishing license, and the F and G had F and G cultivate in some of the license areas.

At the licensing site of the instant fishery, there was no person engaged in the business of cultivating seaweeds other than Plaintiff, F, and G. D.

Around April 2005, the Newanan-gun conducted an investigation into the impact of damage on fishery rights due to the construction, as the temporary construction of H was implemented in the area of the instant fishing license site. As a result of the investigation, the scope of direct damage, the scope of indirect damage, 18.2ha, and the annual average reduction rate of production is 10% in the case of the scope of direct damage, and 30% in the case of indirect damage.

The plaintiff suspended Kim Farming in around 2006 and removed aquaculture facilities due to the implementation of the temporary construction of the year school.

E. Pursuant to the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects, the Newanan-gun paid the Defendant compensation for the scope of direct damage to the instant fishery license KRW 246,184,670 (hereinafter “the instant direct damage compensation”) and compensation for indirect damage scope KRW 50,121,333 (hereinafter “instant indirect damage compensation”).

F. The plaintiff was the defendant's leader at the time of paying compensation for losses.

The defendant holds a general meeting on February 10, 2009 and holds this case.