Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 17, 2015, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties by fraudulent means reported the false fact that he/she was arrested from the police officers in the act of assault from Pyeongtaek-si C and 101 Dong 1102 on the same day and called his/her cell phone to 112 reporting the 112 reporting center to which he/she “the police officer inflicted a bodily injury on B.” and made the police officers dispatch to the above place on January 17, 2015, and from January 12:06 to January 20:06, 200 to January 18, 2015, the Defendant entered the list of crimes in the annexed sheet of list of crimes: 20:50:16 on a yearly date of receipt of No. 4 in the bill of indictment from the police officers on the same day, which is apparent to be a clerical error of 22:50:16.

In the same way, 14 times a total of 14 times a false report, and the police officer sent out a police officer to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reporting duties and criminal investigations by fraudulent means.

2. On January 18, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the Jung-gu Police Station within the 71 Sin-si Central Don Police Station located in Pyeongtaek-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on January 18, 2015; (b) was under the influence of alcohol; and (c) was arrested by police officers at the same time, at the time, at the public office for about 70 minutes by avoiding disturbance, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each 112 case handling table, the main statement [the defendant and his defense counsel are reports based on truth, and paragraphs 1 through 14 of the attached list of crimes are merely urgings the police to dispatch them to the police, so there is no false report. According to the evidence of this case, the defendant filed a report as if the circumstances in the past occurred in the past, or reported as if there were no actual damage or problem (attached Table Nos. 1 through 3 of the list of crimes), and as if there were no such circumstances (attached Table Nos. 4 through 14 of the list of crimes), the police officer was dispatched to solve this result.