A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 23, 2018: around 30, the Defendant: Around 17, 2018, the victim D (42 tax) that was not good between the Defendant and the Defendant, while having installed the Defendant’s vehicle in front of C, and drinking water in dry field, was transferred to the Defendant in order to drive the vehicle (42 cm) and used a dangerous object (40 cm in total length, 20 cm in length, 20 cm in the Defendant’s vehicle) with the Defendant’s face as “to die,” and the victim’s inside was cut off one time, with the victim’s face attached to each other, and the victim’s tight part was broken down with the victim’s right-hand hand.

As a result, the defendant carried a contribute, which is a dangerous object, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as impairment of the face requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to victims D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Mutic photographs;

1. As to the attachment of the investigation report (as to the attachment ofCCTV images and photographs)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements from victims);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of the protection and observation and the punishment of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is committed in a considerable degree of danger while the defendant has verbally or has a dispute with the victim;

As a result, the nature and circumstances of the crime are not provided against the victim.

The crime of this case seems to have suffered a considerable fear and mental suffering as well as physical injury.

In 2014, the Defendant had been punished for 500,000 won due to fiff, thereby causing damage to the siff, thereby committing the instant crime. In addition, the Defendant committed the instant crime, even though there was a history of punishment for 500,000 won due to fiff, thereby causing damage to the siff.