Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 11:00 on September 24, 2016, found that the victim E and his wife F et al., living together with the Defendant, were at night under night trees, and the victim E was able to take night at night. The Defendant, “hump and night trees in our land and night trees at night.”

B. The victim sees that there has been a conflict between the victim and D with the victim by stating that he/she is a Doar, Doar.

“Along with the length of 47 cm and 20 cm which is a dangerous thing cited by the hand, the victim’s face side was threatened as the victim E was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against E or F;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (verification of the suspect, the situation at the time of dispatch to the scene, etc.);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283(1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s argument under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that he/she only has an friendly improvement during the first work and that he/she did not use it for the crime of this case. However, in light of the situation at which the Defendant’s partial statement and investigation report (at the time of dispatch to the scene, confirmation of the suspect, the situation at the time of the injured party, etc.) may be acknowledged by the Defendant’s statement and investigation report (at the time of dispatch to the scene, the Defendant cited a dispute with the injured party during the consultation with the injured party, continued the consultation with the injured party until the police arrived at the arrival of the police, and brought the improvement and the nature of the improvement (referring to dangerous things that may cause harm to the people), etc., the Defendant’s argument is credibility in the statement made by the injured party and the wife of the injured party, and according to the evidence, including the above evidence, the Defendant’s argument is not accepted.