1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 4, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and discharged the Plaintiff from active service on March 24, 2014.

B. On April 2013, when the Plaintiff was undergoing the special training after entering the National Armed Forces, he/she transferred to the general unit and was in the military unit, and was in the military military service, he/she gets out of the mountain with heavy weapons, such as ammunition and heavy season, while undergoing training, such as the Gu newsletter, etc. on October 7, 2013. On October 25, 2013, he/she was diagnosed as vertebrate separation certificate at the National Armed Forces Hospital of Daejeon on July 7, 2013. After having taken leave, the Plaintiff got out of the National Armed Forces Hospital to undergo the surgery to alleviate the brue pain, and received during the surgery on November 19, 2013.

On December 16, 2013, the Plaintiff re-hospitalized the Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, and was hospitalized until March 24, 2014, and was hospitalized until March 24, 2014, and was determined on the 5th century by the resolution on the separation certificate of spine between 5,00 and the pre-exploitious disease, and was discharged from military service on March 24, 2014.

C. On April 8, 2014 after the Plaintiff was discharged from military service, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that “vertebrate 5-6” was different from the Defendant. However, on September 1, 2014, the Defendant applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation. On September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff’s “vertebrates No. 5-Tre

(D) The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on November 24, 2014, but dismissed on April 21, 2015, on the ground that it is difficult to recognize that the external trauma of the signboard escape certificate was not verified and that it was difficult to recognize that the military performance of duties or education and training led to the aggravation of the nature. Accordingly, the Plaintiff rendered a decision equivalent to the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation and notified the Plaintiff of the decision.