1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the end of the item of “a judgment” in Article 2.2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Details to be added to the end of "..." item of the judgment of the first instance, namely, an administrative disposition subject to appeal litigation, is an act of an administrative agency under public law, which is directly related to the specific rights and obligations of the people, such as ordering the establishment of rights or the burden of obligations with respect to a specific matter, or directly generating other legal effects. The approval, consent, direction, etc. of a subordinate administrative agency, etc. of a superior administrative agency, is not likely to indirectly affect the rights and obligations of the people in a subordinate administrative agency, which is not bound to be bound by its instructions, etc. in rendering dispositions against the people. However, as long as a subordinate administrative agency did not actually take a disposition against the people, it does not directly cause direct changes to the specific rights and obligations of the people, and thus, it cannot be deemed an administrative disposition subject to appeal litigation.

(See Supreme Court Decision 97Nu8540 Decided September 26, 1997, Supreme Court Decision 94Du33 Decided September 10, 1994, Supreme Court Decision 2008Du2583 Decided May 15, 2008, etc.). Although the Defendant notified the Health Center in this case to the project implementer of the Gyeonggi-do Industrial Complex Plan for the Ansan-si and the Ansan-Sedong Industrial Complex on December 16, 2013, the “the result of the deliberation on the plan for the general industrial complex of the Ansan-dong, etc.” was not directly changed to the specific rights and obligations of the people until the Ansan-si market approves the industrial complex as an industrial complex according to the above deliberation result, the above deliberation result is that there is no direct change to the specific rights and obligations of the people.