A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 14, 2016, at around 02:25, the Defendant 02:25, on the street in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, reported the victim D (names, 8, 34 years of age) to have a sexual intercourse through the so-called “Hunting”, and, on the premise that the victim had a sexual relationship, the victim Dad "I kn kn n kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn

The facts charged are as follows: "In the future, it has been close to the future, and the victim has gone beyond the floor.

Although it is described as ",", according to the victim's statement, "undertakes the victim into the bottom and breaking the victim over the floor."

“.......” is amended.

As a result, the defendant forced the victim to commit an indecent act, and thereby, the victim suffered bodily injury, such as the influence of a bridge that requires treatment for about 28 days, and the complete escape of a baby.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D (the identity of a victim);

1. Photographss of the victim's injury, CCTV-faging photographs, and CDs;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel in the injury medical certificate

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's panty panty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanty spant

However, according to the consistent and specific statements made by the victim, the above assertion is not accepted, since the defendant put up the victim's panty in her panty with his panty in her panty, and her panty is found to have been her panty.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel recognized that the defendant was scambling the victim and inflicted scambling on the victim, but the complete escape of the victim is the defendant who escaped.