logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.17 2017고단1770
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was on board the victim D (60 tax) in front of C at the time of influence around 19:20 on July 20, 201, and (b) was on board B (60) by fraud

E D D, as the victim D followed and resisted with a string of a vehicle without any reason, the string of the vehicle and the string of the vehicle, the string of the string, the string of the string of the string, and the string of the string of the string of the string.

2. The Defendant: (a) laid down bricks (27 cm in width, 12 cm in length, 12 cm in height) which are dangerous objects in the vicinity of the above time and place; (b) laid down three times the victim D who was seated in the driver’s seat of the above vehicle, and broken down a glass window front of the driver’s seat.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted violence on the victim and at the same time destroyed the above vehicle owned by the victim B.

3. Around 19:40 on July 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) induced the Defendant at a different place; (b) and (c) followed the Defendant at the same place, and (d) was on the top of the sloping apartment, which was located on the sloping-ro 1-gil 9, south of the U.S., and was on the front of the sloping-ro 112, and was on the sloping-ro 112, the Defendant was found to have been on the sloping-ro 112, who was on the front of the sloping-ro, and was called on the sloping-ro 112, who was on the sloping-rof, and was on the front of the sloping-ro 19:40 on the sloping-ro 19:40s.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time damaged the patrol cars used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against B, D, and H;

1. Application of six-way Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Articles 260 (1), 261, 369 (1), 366, 136 (1), and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38.

arrow