Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an operator of the “C” in Pyeongtaek-si B and 5, and D, E, and F are employees of the said establishment.

1. No one, other than a massage accredited accredited by the Mayor/Do governor who has violated the Medical Service Act, shall establish a massage place;

Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant was not a massage, the Defendant opened the said “C” and had D, an employee of the said business, receive KRW 50,000,000 from the customer who found in the said business at around December 21, 2019, to engage in massage for profit.

As a result, the Defendant established a massage practice center even though he is not a massage accredited.

2. Around December 2019, the Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act, employed, as an employee, E and F, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at the immediately preceding business establishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each police suspect interrogation protocol against D, E, or F;

1. Article 87-2(2)2, Article 82(3), and Article 33(2)1 (a) of the Medical Service Act (amended by Act No. 17089, Mar. 24, 2020); Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 17089, Mar. 24, 2020); Article 18(3) (a) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 17089, Mar. 24, 202); the selection of fines for each crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the defendant alleged that the defendant was unaware of whether the crime of this case was a crime, but such circumstance is merely a mere legal ground, and it is difficult to view it as a mistake of law with legitimate reason under Article 16 of the Criminal Act,