Cases
2018Do2187 (A) Fraud
(b) Magion;
Defendant
A
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Attorney C, BL
Law Firm BM
Attorneys BN, BO, and BP
The judgment below
Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2016Do1562 Decided January 11, 2018
Imposition of Judgment
April 12, 2018
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of fraud, such as trial-oriented principle, direct deliberation principle, evidence trial principle, non-deflu
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Judges
The presiding judge shall keep the record of the Justice
The Chief Justice Park Jae-young
Justices Kim Gin-young
Justices Cho Jae-chul