A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 4, 2017, at around 20:10, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim C was expected to have been faced with the system security devices, and (b) was removed from D, the manager, and thus, he refused to obtain a recommendation to return home; (c) and (d) the victim’s market price was defined with the defluence of the defluence of the defluence of the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's paintings.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties, at the same time, at the same time as the mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and at the same place as the mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and after receiving a report from the said D, set up one-time price on the left side part of the Hacheon Police Station E District F and Police Officer G sent out to the said place to check the damage caused by D, and tried to have the Defendant returned to the said place, but alinium support unit of alinium material of alinium ( approximately 120cm in length, 1.5cm in length, snicker, and 1.5cm in length) located at the said place.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reporting duties and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with H and D;

1. Place of work;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 144(1), 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of special official duties) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case is committed against a police officer who has worn a uniform without being well aware of the fact that the defendant, for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, was sentenced to a fine three times by force of the same kind of violence, and the number of crimes is dangerous. Considering the unfavorable circumstances, the fact that the defendant is against the law, the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim of the damage of property, and the defendant's age and sexual behavior.