1. Two above ground facilities for purifying reinforced concrete tanks in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, B and C among the instant cattle.

1. Details of confinement;

(a) Authorization and public notice of the implementation plan for the urban planning facility project of the Ycheon-gun National Assembly (D Construction Work) (hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion (i) the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of acceptance on November 7, 201 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of acceptance”) 1) Plaintiff’s assertion ① Gyeonggi-gun F (hereinafter “F”).

() B and G land remains remaining as the remaining land due to the expropriation of the said land. As such, the Defendant also expropriates the remaining land, and the Defendant demands to expropriate the first through 8 boxes on the ground, such as C, owned by the Plaintiff, and the first through 8 boxes on the ground): The commencement date of expropriation: (i) January 5, 2012; (ii) compensation amount: (iii) KRW 81,677,250; (iv) KRW 81,67,250 among the remaining land in the Plaintiff’s assertion; (v) only one of the remaining land in H, I, J and the Plaintiff’s assertion (two boxes on the land C; 373.8 square meters on the land); and (v) the remainder and the assertion of the building are rejected.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s objection on June 22, 2012 (hereinafter “instant objection”) 1) Plaintiff’s assertion (1) acceptance of the remaining land (K land) and 7 buildings (including C and other on the ground) that have not been expropriated in the adjudication of expropriation, and (2) demand the National Land Tribunal to increase compensation for the expropriated land and buildings in accordance with the reality, etc. - increased KRW 8,786,250 for compensation for the remaining land - KRW 24,25,600 for the expropriated land - The claim for expropriation of the remaining land and buildings that have not been expropriated in the adjudication of expropriation is rejected [based on recognition], there is no dispute [including the case with each number), each entry of subparagraphs 1 through 7 (including the number) and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.

2. We examine the legitimacy of each claim for compensation concerning the two "two facilities for purifying steel reinforced concrete tanks" and seven "seven buildings" among the lawsuit of this case ex officio in determining the legitimacy of the lawsuit of this case.

A. It is as stated in the relevant laws and regulations attached thereto.

(b).