beta
Text
1. The plaintiff, the defendant Gap 28,935,486 won, and the defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. jointly with the defendant Gap.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Status 1 of the parties concerned is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).
(2) A stock company B (hereinafter referred to as “B”) is an industrial accident compensation insurance policyholder under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and C (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) is an employee of B.
3) Defendant A’s vehicle D (hereinafter “Korea-Japan”)
A) The owner and the driver of the vehicle is the Defendant Company, and the Defendant Company is a business liability insurance contract under which the Defendant Company compensates for the damages to be borne by the Defendant A in connection with the operation of the vehicle within the limit of KRW 50 million (hereinafter “instant liability insurance contract”).
(B) On December 18, 2012, at the site of “G Additional Works” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, performed by B, around December 18, 2012, Defendant A was driving a harming vehicle and transported the harming vehicle. While the victim was under the control of traffic on the surrounding road for smooth movement of the harming vehicle, the vehicle on the harming vehicle was under the control of traffic on the harming vehicle, but the vehicle on the her own was under the control of traffic on the harming vehicle, and there was an accident against the vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
2) In the instant accident, the victim was hospitalized treatment from December 18, 2012 to June 17, 2013 after suffering from the injury, such as “the stoke of the upper upper stoke, the right upper stoke, the upper stoke of the bones, the right upper stoke, the left stoke of the upper stoke, the left stoke of the upper stoke, the left stoke of the left stoke of the upper stoke of the instant accident,” and the victim was provided with outpatient treatment from June 18, 2013 to December 27, 2013. (C) The Plaintiff and the Defendant Company recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident and received industrial accident compensation insurance benefits (hereinafter “insurance benefits”).