Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 7. 18. 06:51경 서산시 충의로 2061 대산삼호아파트 101동 앞 주차장에서 술에 취해 남자친구인 B의 차량 내 물건을 파손하여 피고인의 귀가를 도와줄 것을 요청하는 위 B의 신고를 받고 출동한 서산경찰서 C지구대 소속 경찰관인 경장 D로부터 귀가를 권유받자 주먹으로 위 D의 오른쪽 팔을 2회 때리고, 손으로 D의 왼쪽 손목을 비틀고, 충남지방경찰청 소속 경찰관인 순경 E이 위 주차장에 주차된 다른 차량 위로 올라가려는 피고인을 만류하자 발로 위 E의 왼쪽 다리 부위를 발로 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies, and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and B;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that the defendant's argument on the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder at the time of the instant case.

According to the records, although the defendant could be recognized that he was drinking at the time of the crime of this case, in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the means and method of the crime, and the defendant's speech and behavior before and after the crime of this case, the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case

or weak conditions may not be deemed to have existed.

The reason for sentencing is that it is not good to use violence against police officers who want to return home.

However, the extent of the defendant's use of violence is not hot, and the defendant agreed with D.