logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.12.22 2016가단53861
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Of each real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. Defendant L = 36/2,835 shares to Plaintiff B, with respect to Plaintiff A, C, D, E, and F.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The networkO married with P and caused children to have the net Q and net R, network S, network T, network U, net V, network M, Defendant X, Defendant J, and Defendant N on July 10, 1983.

(B) Afterma, P died on December 14, 2002).

The net Q was married with the Plaintiff B, and caused Plaintiff A, C, Y, E, F, and G to their children, and died on May 14, 199.

C. Meanwhile, the heir of the network R, network S, network T, network U, networkV, and network W is identical to the description of the heir and the third heir in the attached Table of the Defendants’ inheritance shares, and the Defendants’ inheritance shares are same as that of the aforementioned table.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, each fact inquiry inquiry about Z area office, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the primary claim (excluding the claim against Defendant L, K, and M)

A. The Plaintiff’s assertionO owned various lands, including the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”). On April 10, 1957, the instant real estate was owned by the head of the South, South, and the remainder was a son Q’s share. The Plaintiff’s assertionO respondeded to all children.

As such, the instant real estate was donated by the deceasedO to the deceased Q, and the Plaintiffs, the heir of the net Q and net Q, possessed and used the instant real estate up to now, but only did not complete the registration of ownership transfer.

Therefore, the Defendants, the heir (or heir in case of the death of the deceased) of the deceasedO, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on April 10, 1957 with respect to the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs, the heir of the deceased Q.

B. Determination AA testified that P, as the wife of the networkO and the mother of the network Q, was able to do so to do so to AA, that the instant real estate was a net Q, and that it was also about the transfer of the instant real estate to the net Q several times. However, even based on the aforementioned testimony of AA, the GO directly uses it.

arrow