A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 29, 2019, at around 21:40, the Defendant: (a) stated that “D” convenience points operated by the victim C (Name and 27 years of age) who is an employee of the above convenience store under the influence of alcohol and without any justifiable reason, the Defendant interfered with the accounting of other customers, such as: (b) string the left eye of E under the elbowe, blue blue, and blue blue blue, and blue E, blue E with a hand, and blue blue blue, and brue E with a blue blue bru, and brue the brue device in the calculation unit; (c) 40 minutes of the Defendant’s act of taking advantage of the convenience store and taking a bath for the convenience store.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store operation by force.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, while under the influence of alcohol at the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph (1), laid down plastic tables and chairs on the floor that the victim C installed outside of convenience stores without any justifiable reason, and broken down one plastic chair in an amount equivalent to KRW 100,000,000, the market price of the victim’s possession.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

3. On April 29, 2019, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties reported 112 on April 22 and 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) asked the victim G, a police officer affiliated with the F District District of the Southern Police Station, to present his identification card; (b) sent out to the victim; and (c) expressed the victim’s desire, such as “I am to start, schep, schep, and schep,” “I am to move into the convenience store; (d) I am to move into the convenience store; and (e) expressed the victim’s breast part of the victim’s chest on his hand, and assaulted twice the victim’s chest on the upper part of the police gate on which the victim was seated, with two instances of flusing electricity on the upper part of the chest.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;