Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a DNA-learning car.

On November 8, 2015, the Defendant came to turn to the left at the right-hand turn at the 3rd side of the Doma in front of the 3rd side of the Doma, Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon. 07:00 on November 8, 2015.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side of that place, the driver had a duty of care to properly see the front side and the right and the right and the right of the driver, and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering and the brakes.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded on as is, while crossing the crosswalk from the left side of the proceeding direction to the right side of the pedestrian signal light, the victim E (72 ) who crossed the crosswalk to the right side of the pedestrian signal light without permission, went beyond the light after the left side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered by such occupational negligence the injury that caused the risk of life, such as a general cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism and cerebral typhism, or an incurable or incurable disease, without accompanying the victim’s detailed unknown malphism, or any other injury that caused the risk of life, such as cerebral typhism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Each G statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Investigation report (packer H telephone call);

1. Medical certificates and opinions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 3(1) and 4(1)2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on Suspension of Execution of the Criminal Procedure (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant is running against the time of the crime of this case, and that the defendant's side of the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant under the agreement with his/her father, who is the victim (under the health condition of the victim, the defendant was unable to reach a direct agreement with the victim. If the defendant was directly agreed with the victim, or if the defendant