The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant is erroneous in misconception of facts, although the defendant did not have stolen an envelope containing cash between the victim and the victim at the cash payment deadline.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the court of the trial, which duly adopted and examined the evidence, i.e., ① the victim consistently stated at the investigative agency that the envelope 4,30,000 won was lost, and the victim confirmed CCTV at the victim’s request after becoming aware of the damage, and it is confirmed that the victim has credibility in the above statement of the victim when the victim comes to the above left part of the cash payment period on 504 cash payment period. ② According to CCTV image, according to these CCTV images, the victim puts the white envelope at the left part of the cash payment period. After that, it is difficult for the defendant to find any close range until the cash payment period, and the defendant was removed from the above cash payment period to the investigation agency, and the defendant's remaining part of the bags was found to not have been able to be able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have a new envelope. After that, the defendant's remaining part of the Defendant's cash payment period before his statement.