logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2020.11.19 2020고정147
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000 by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a cafeteria operator in the original city C, and the defendant A is an employee of the above “D”.

1. No person who accused A shall sell, lend or distribute alcoholic beverages which are drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles, or provide them free of charge for profit;

Nevertheless, at around 00:30 on November 9, 2019, the Defendant sold to E (n, 17 years of age) a juvenile, “te,” 1 disease, 2 disease, and 1 disease, 16,000 won, to E (n, 17 years of age).

2. No person who is accused B shall sell, lend or distribute alcoholic beverages which are drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles, or provide them free of charge for profit;

Nevertheless, around 00:04 on November 14, 2019, the Defendant sold 24,000 won 24, to four youth “D”, including “F” (n, 16 years of age) and “kick” 5 illness and “kick” disease.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each statement of F, G and H;

1. On-site photographs and related news reports (E’s oral statement hearing) [Defendant A’s assertion that at the time of the instant case, Defendant A was unaware of being a juvenile by presenting another person’s identification card, which is an adult, but the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, juvenile E stated that Defendant A did not conduct an identification card at the above “D” restaurant where Defendant A was at the time of the instant court’s consistent adoption from the investigative agency to the present court, and that E’s statement that there was no identification card prosecutor at the time of the instant proceeding I and consistent with E’s statement, the above argument by the Defendant is without merit] legal application of the law.

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Article 28 (1) of the same Act and the selection of fines for offenses;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;

arrow