logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.12.20 2012고합402
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

30,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2010, the Defendant was in charge of building permission and was in charge of overall corrective measures.

On November 2006, the Defendant: (a) received a request from M which was constructing parking buildings on the ground of the Kimhae-si, and (b) approved the modification of the construction design (the modification of the construction permit) on November 13, 2006, through N SecretariatO to “the design modification permit has been granted to expand the total floor area of the building.”

After that, on December 5, 2006, the Defendant called M, “I would have well known, and I would like to display I would like to display I would like to displayO.” The O received a letter of KRW 25 million check and KRW 1 million check from M from M in Q office in Kimhae-si, and then delivered it to the Defendant by exchanging the above KRW 25 million check with KRW 1 million with KRW 30,000,000, KRW 25 million to be used by the Defendant.

The Defendant accepted KRW 30 million as a check to theO, and the Defendant ordered M to “The check, which is subject to settlement in cash, and is held in house,” and returned the above KRW 1 million check to Qro, and theO received it and delivered the Defendant’s horse to Qro, Inc., Qro, and then returned the above KRW 30 million check to Qro, which is called “the owner of a market by changing it into cash,” and the Plaintiff returned the above KRW 1 million check to Qro.

M, as of December 8, 2006, around the end of theO, he exchanged 27,000 won of the check held by R and 3 million won of the check held by R and 300,000 won in cash at the defendant's house in Kimhae-si, 105, 503, and delivered 30 million won in cash to T and her wife at the defendant's office.

Accordingly, the defendant received 30 million won as a bribe in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness M orO;

1. Details of the account in the name of M;

arrow