(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.12.05 2014고단2380

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.12.05 2014고단2380

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The excessive one (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00 on July 12:10, 2014, at E-cafeteria operated along with the wife D (53 years old); (b) on the grounds that the victim did not enter the house at the night immediately preceding night, the Defendant shot the remainder of the crow, which was a dangerous object, left the bar, and got a portable gas siren, which was a dangerous object, and carried the dangerous object, carried the victim with the eyebrow for the treatment period.

2. On July 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:25, the Defendant, who carried a deadly weapon, committed an assault to the victim by carrying a excessive amount of dangerous things, such as a 11cm in the blade length, and a knife the victim’s knife, in the instant E restaurant for the same reasons as that of the preceding paragraph; and (b) carrying a knife the victim’s knife.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. A witness D's partial statement at the sixth public trial;

1. Police and suspect examination protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in D (No. 19 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. On-site photographs (Evidence No. 32 pages) The Defendant denies the criminal intent of injury by asserting that the victim was frightly facing the victim, not the victim, while recognizing the fact that the victim was injured by leaving a bar portable gas siren, and that the Defendant was frightly facing the victim on the London gas siren.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court are: (a) the Defendant stated that the Defendant attempted to obtain a pre-contracted customer and did not engage in defective funeral services; (b) the motive for committing a crime may be recognized; (c) the Defendant appeared as a witness on the second trial date and testified that the Defendant did not cause any injury to himself/herself; and (d) he/she partially reversed his/her statement on the sixth trial date after having testified that he/she did not cause any injury to himself/herself.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.10.22 2015고단940

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2013.11.01 2013고단475

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.11.28 2014고단964

-대구지방법원 2015.05.19 2015고단672

-서울북부지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단3493