Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2015, the Defendant was under investigation at the seat next to the Defendant, while being under investigation at the 67 Pyeongtaek-si Police Station type physician and office at the central office of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station at around 06:40 on July 28, 2015.

C had been able to avoid disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as being sealed with head and being able to see, “the fluor’s father shall also die,” and being able to take a large voice.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (with respect to the details of use of police gear, and the circumstances leading to the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Optional to the punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. Points of special violence against C;

A. On July 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “E” located in Pyeongtaek-si D around 03:50 on July 28, 2015; (b) the victim C (44 years) and this Defendant did not repay the amount of KRW 500,000 (50,000).

As the body of the victim's face is shicked by a defectr, and the victim's face was shicked by several times, and as a dangerous object in the table, the victim's face was hicked, and the victim was f.m.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

B. We examine whether the Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, threatened with beer’s disease, was at the frighten of the victim and the victim.

Accordingly, the witness C’s legal statement is that ① whether he was shouldered by beer, whether he was worn out, and whether he was faced with C is entirely inconsistent with the investigative agency and court’s statement, ② under the influence of alcohol, the situation in which he was fighting, and approximately one year has passed since the occurrence of the instant case.