logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.02.12 2019가단13097
증서진부확인
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Although the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff for a loan claim (hereinafter "prior lawsuit") and lost in the first instance court, on March 26, 2009, the appellate court (Seoul Western District Court 2008Na7394) rendered a favorable judgment that "the plaintiff shall pay to the defendant the amount of KRW 45 million and the amount calculated by the rate of 20% per annum from April 1, 1998 to the date of full payment", and the above judgment was finalized on April 14, 2009.

B. On May 17, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit (Seoul Western District Court 2019Na45) against the said final judgment by asserting that the “written statement of performance, declaration of performance, and statement of performance” (hereinafter “instant document”) which was the evidence of the final and conclusive judgment of the prior suit was forged, but partially dismissed on October 17, 2019 and the remaining judgment of dismissing the claim was pronounced.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion was submitted by the Defendant as evidence in the appellate court of the prior suit, and returned the instant document, and the records of the instant case were destroyed, and the Plaintiff was not aware of the content of the instant document, but the said document was not prepared in a genuine manner.

In addition, for the above request for retrial, it should be confirmed whether the defendant has forged the document of this case.

3. Determination

(a) In a case where a lawsuit has already been filed over a legal relationship to be proved by a document, it would be possible to resolve the dispute in the lawsuit, and thus, the filing of a lawsuit to confirm whether the document is authentic does not have the benefit of confirmation, barring special circumstances.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Da29290, 29306, Jun. 14, 2007). Moreover, even if the truth of a document seeking confirmation has been determined by a lawsuit, it cannot be said that a document’s legal relationship or legal status to be proved cannot be eliminated, and the said right or legal relationship itself is confirmed in order to eliminate legal uncertainty.

arrow