1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was elected as the Defendant’s proportional representative member in the election of the member of the fifth local council, which was implemented on June 2, 2010.

B. On May 3, 2013, Nonparty C, who is in office as a member of the Gyeonggi-do Council, filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on the charge of defamation. The gist of the complaint is as follows.

Although the above C did not have any factually inappropriate relationship with the operator of the “D” restaurant, the Plaintiff is deemed to be a member of the Defendant’s Council at the planning and administrative committee office around 11:00 on April 23, 2013, Nonparty E (hereinafter referred to as the “member of the Defendant”) who is the cause of the Defendant’s affiliation within the office of the planning and administrative committee office of B City Council.

2) On the 11:30 following the day, the Do Council member stated the false fact that “The Do Council member was aware that he was traveling in Jeju-do for three months prior to the D restaurant operator’s inappropriate relation,” and 2) around the 11:30th day following the day, Nonparty F Speaker and G Council member’s false fact to the same purport, and 3) around 13:00 on the 26th day of the 26th day of the 26th day of the 26th day of the 13:06th day of the 3th day of the 3th day of the 40th day of the Do Council members including the above G, at the time of the 40th day of the Do Council members including the above G, G was in an inappropriate relation with the Do Council member’s Do Council member’s request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff by stating that “The 2nd day before the 3th day of the 3th day of the 1st day of the 20th day of the Do Council member’s request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff.