logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.08.28 2014고합27
뇌물공여등
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months;

B. The first police officer of October 2012, among the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: In order to be selected as a basic and executing design service provider in relation to the project for feasibility study of civil engineering, construction, etc. in the H building at Changwon-si, the Defendant took charge of the following duties as a regular manager at the time of committing the following crimes in order to be selected as a business entity for the establishment of a livestock excreta public disposal facility ordered by the J-Gun Office (hereinafter “I”); and K is the regular manager of M for the purpose of manufacturing a comprehensive water treatment device in Busan Gangseo-gu L, Busan, for the purpose of manufacturing a comprehensive water treatment device, and the aforementioned project ordered by the J-Gun Office.

N on January 12, 1990, he/she was appointed as a public official of the J-Gun Office (Grade 9) and was promoted to a local environmental management official (Grade 6) on May 17, 2004, and then was in charge of the establishment of a plan and the selection of a business operator related to the installation of a livestock excreta disposal facility ordered by the J-Gun Office as a public official from 2008 to 2010.

On the other hand, on February 17, 2009, the J-Gun Office established a plan for the installation of a public livestock excreta disposal facility on December 31, 2009 and completed the feasibility study and the establishment of a basic plan on December 31, 2009, and on September 9, 2010, the J-Gun Office selected I as a basic and implementation design service provider on September 16, 201 through a selective competitive tendering procedure to select a basic and working design service provider.

The Defendant related to the offering of a bribe - The offer of a bribe - The Defendant, as above, was awarded a contract by I as a basic and implementation design service provider, from October 201 to November 201 of the same year, to the effect that “I are given more convenience than I are given to N in the process of tendering the basic and implementation design service provider, so that I can be awarded a successful bid in the process of tendering the basic and implementation design service provider.”

arrow