A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, for about two months, contacted with the Victim C (Inn, 29 years of age), who was in contact with the Defendant to recover the relationship with the Victim C (In, her, her 29 years of age), but refused to meet the Defendant, and the Defendant, around September 22, 2014, refused to follow the bus, followed the Victim’s arms coming from the bus in front of the bus stops located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon.

Although the Defendant received a demand from the victim to get off the said vehicle while driving the vehicle, the Defendant, “I Doman L,” and “I am frightly suffering from the width,” and “I am am frightly die if I am am dead. I am am frighten.” On September 13, 2014, around 58 km from September 13, 2014 to the Olympic 93-7, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to prevent the victim from getting out of the said vehicle, while I am am frightend against the victim, and the front part of the said vehicle was frightend around the Olympic am.

As a result, the Defendant detained the victim for about 1 hour and 50 minutes, and caused the victim to suffer any injury such as pressure, closure, and so on, which could not be known during the treatment period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment of on-site photographs at the time of a traffic accident), investigation report (Attachment of text messages), opinion, criminal investigation report (Attachment of a copy of a rental contract for a siren vehicle), investigation report (related to the distance detained by a suspect on D vehicles);

1. The first sentence of Article 281 (1) and Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act is that the case was prosecuted on September 24, 2014, and the sentencing criteria for the injury resulting from confinement, which took effect from October 1, 2014, do not apply.

In this case, the defendant is in the past relationship.