1. The plaintiff's claim against the primary defendant B is dismissed.

2. The Preliminary Defendant Han-ton Co., Ltd.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D and E, the Plaintiff’s wife, jointly concluded a sales contract with the F on December 4, 2012, and with respect to G forest 24,694 square meters in public land owned by F (hereinafter “instant forest land”). As to the instant land and H 9682 square meters in public land, the purchase price of KRW 1.2 billion in the instant forest was KRW 1.22 billion in the down payment and KRW 40 million in the down payment of KRW 120 million in the contract date, the remainder of KRW 80 million in the remainder until December 5, 2012, and the remainder of KRW 1.188 million in the remainder by February 23, 2013 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B. On December 4, 2012, D entered into a design service contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the Defendant Company’s agent, for the purpose of developing and selling the instant forest as a factory site, etc., and the Defendant Company offered D with KRW 120 million civil engineering and construction design services following the instant permission for development of forest land, farmland diversion consultation, consultation on occupation and use of roads, and application for occupation and use of access roads, and D entered into a design service contract with the aim of settling service fees into substitute land (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

C. Around December 2012, F, the former owner of the instant forest, issued to I a written consent to land use and a certificate of seal impression with respect to the instant forest.

F In order for D and E not to pay any balance under the instant sales contract, F filed an application for the settlement of the balance under the instant sales contract with the Daejeon District Court’s official branch office 2013M2222.

By August 9, 2013, D and E jointly pay F the balance of KRW 1,00,000 and KRW 50,000,000 for delay compensation until August 9, 2013. If D and E fail to pay the balance and damages for delay by the above date, they made a decision in lieu of the conciliation that the instant sales contract should become null and void, but D and E did not pay the balance and damages for delay by the above deadline.

E. The Defendant Company: (a) with the letter of consent to land use issued by F under the name of Defendant B, an employee of the Defendant Company, and (b) on May 9, 2013 from the official city.