logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.08.28 2019고단2315
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From March 4, 2019 to around the 25th day of the same month, Defendant A employed female employees E, etc. at the Seo-gu Seoul Building and the 2nd day of the Defendant’s operation of the second floor and had male customers find their places of similarity with each other, and arranged sexual traffic in a manner that: (a) received KRW 80,000 to KRW 10,000 for each customer and received KRW 80,000 or KRW 10,000 for each customer and the Defendant and female employees divided into five to five.

2. Defendant B, while working as an employee of the above “D” business place at the above date, time, and place, assisted and assisted the A’s arrangement business by providing guidance to the customers who find the place, and by providing guidance to the said business place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F and E;

1. Photographs photographs of the business;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Defendant A who choose to impose imprisonment: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Defendant B: Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act; Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Defendant A- favorable circumstances: The fact that the Defendant recognized his/her mistake, the fact that the Defendant is a primary offender, the fact that the Defendant is an owner of a sexual traffic business establishment;

2. Considerations such as Defendant B - The fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake, the fact that the Defendant was the primary offender, and the fact that the crime was committed in aiding and abetting.

arrow