Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and a fine of 50,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. From July 6, 2015 to July 10, 2015, Defendant A employed female employees, such as D, while operating the “D” and the “E” in Bupyeong-si Office Officetel 512 and 1312 in Bupyeong-si Office Office C, Bupyeong-gu, Busan, and then had them receive KRW 130,00 to 20,000 from the influent customers who find the place, and had the said female employees provide sexual intercourse, and then, Defendant A paid to female employees the money calculated by KRW 70,000 per time from 70,000 to 90,000 from 10,000 to 10,000,000 for commercial sex acts.

2. From July 8, 2015 to July 10, 2015, Defendant B engaged in commercial sex acts against approximately 5 customers, including F, in a manner of having sexual intercourses with customers who want to receive KRW 90,000 per customer from the “E” (E) 1312, Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ctel from the business owner around July 8, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Each statement of L/F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes No. 512 to the list of seizure, protocol of seizure, photograph, C 1312, and C 512;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Selection of a fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Calculation Details of a surcharge: 140,00 won = 70 won = x (minimum 20,00 won), see the third police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, see Articles 163 and 167 of the investigation records];

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants are subject to the confession of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the business period is not long, and the Defendants are punished for the same crime.