(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.05.26 2014고정112

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.05.26 2014고정112

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From March 1, 2013, around 21:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “D” of the victim B’s operation “D” located in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, would not have changed the victim’s Kimbed; and (b) took a bath to “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYY

2. Crimes against victims E;

A. A. From March 1, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of March 1, 2013 - interference with business, and the damage and damage to property, the Defendant attempted to take other measures at the “G” point of the “G” point of the operation of the victim E in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on March 21, 2013, and the Defendant avoided disturbance over about 20 minutes, such as: (a) the victim prevented himself from taking other measures; and (b) the victim took a bath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the main business of the victim by force, and damaged the victim's market price of KRW 400,000 by destroying it.

B. The crime committed on March 2, 2013 - the Defendant interfering with business was unable to bring a disturbance over about 40 minutes, including (a) around 01:00 on March 2, 2013; (b) 01:00 on the same place; (c) taking into account whether the Defendant filed a report to the victim; and (d) taking a bath; and (c) taking other actions against the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

3. A crime against Victim H - The Defendant was committed on March 2, 2013, around 06:40 on the day before the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and was committed as if he were to pay a normal taxi fee, and was committed as a police box.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he uses the taxi of the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay KRW 2,400 to the victim's taxi after getting on the taxi, thereby acquiring the same amount of financial benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1.With respect to B, H, and E:

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.07.02 2013고단214

-서울남부지방법원 2020.12.09 2020고단3015

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.10.20 2015고단633

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.06.18 2020고단287

-인천지방법원 2013.01.07 2012고단7285