The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the same year from June 2014.

8. From December 12, 198, the Defendant’s “C” operated by the Defendant in the following city B, where the victim D had neighboring rights, sold six “effective radio” in which the SD Card, which was reproduced without permission by the victim D, was inserted, including the sound source of “F” of “F,” and infringed the victim’s neighboring rights to many unspecified customers.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, and cannot be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act. According to the statement on withdrawal of the written complaint filed on November 21, 2014 after the institution of public prosecution, the victim’s revocation of the complaint against the defendant is recognized. Thus, this part of the indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.