The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing);

A. In relation to the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as misunderstanding of facts and brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (sexual traffic), the defendant committed an act of sexual intercourse with F and F in the E singing practice place. However, the defendant merely received 30,000 won and 50,000 won from shock value, and he did not receive the price for sexual intercourse.

B. The lower court’s sentence (one million won in penalty) against an unfair defendant in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court on the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant: (a) 30,000 won was shock and sexual intercourse in the singing room; and (b) 50,000 won was additionally received after sexual intercourse; and (c) as the Defendant stated that the price for sexual intercourse is KRW 100,000,00,000, the Defendant would later be placed.

The Defendant had talked that he did not demand F’s additional money in trust, and ③ The Defendant considered how 20,000 won was reduced in return for sexual intercourse during a singing time and asked F to determine whether her time has been extended to F is 2,50,000 won for the Defendant’s house and her own house.

The defendant can recognize that he was moving to the house of F in response thereto.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as follows, namely, if the act of sexual intercourse takes place, it appears that the payment for the shock or peting act of sexual intercourse is not necessary to be included in the price for the act of sexual intercourse, and the defendant did not receive 20 million won in return for the act of sexual intercourse.

The defendant seems to have been think of 80,000 won received from F in return for sexual intercourse, but the defendant has given up the receipt of 250,000 won by F in his house.