1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 21, 201, the Plaintiff drafted a document to the effect that the Plaintiff’s land owned by the Plaintiff was donated to F to the Plaintiff’s mother of the Plaintiff’s mother at the E-in coffee shop in Ansan-si.

B. On the same day, the Plaintiff had an obstacle to the confirmation document necessary for the application for ownership transfer registration brought by Defendant C, an employee of Defendant B Certified Judicial Scriveners, who was delegated by Defendant C with respect to the registration of ownership transfer on the said real estate (hereinafter “the confirmation document of this case”).

C. Since then, the Defendants filed an application for ownership transfer registration along with the above confirmation document, etc., and on January 28, 201 and February 10, 201, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the FF on the ground of donation with respect to the land of 46 parcels, including Ansan-si G, the Plaintiff owned on the Plaintiff on February 10, 201.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against F on the grounds that the gift to F under this Court 2016Gahap9867 was forced to perform the procedures for registration of cancellation of ownership transfer registration of this case on October 26, 2017, but was sentenced to a judgment against this court on October 26, 2017, and the Plaintiff appealed against it, but was dismissed, and the present case is still pending in the final appeal.

(Seoul High Court Decision 2017Na2067576, Supreme Court Decision 2018Da267078, Supreme Court Decision 2018Da267078). [Grounds for recognition] The facts of no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, and 15 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Although the Plaintiff did not express his/her intent of donation and did not delegate to D or Defendant B the application for ownership transfer registration of this case, the Defendants conspired with D to forge two copies of each of the gift certificate, proxy document, and confirmation document of this case, and forged them by copying the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate, and attached them to the confirmation document of this case.

In addition, the plaintiff holds a certificate of registration and loses a certificate of registration.