The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: although the defendant has affixed C with the name, address, etc. of the defendant written in the blank, it is true that C has forged it on the ground that he has affixed a seal imprint or a letter of non-performance (the page 228 of the trial record) as a document attached to the application for the provisional registration for transfer of ownership (the page 36 of the trial record), and C has affixed a seal imprint or a letter of non-performance (the page 36 of the trial record) as a document attached to the application for the provisional registration for transfer of ownership, and even though the defendant was not guilty of C, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged is erroneous.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below, the defendant's partial statement at the court below and the court below, C, F, G, H, and I's each legal statement at the court below, the unmanned appraisal result, the notice of the result of document appraisal, the claim for land ownership transfer, and the appraisal result of the National Science Investigation Agency at the court below and the court below. In particular, according to the result of the appraisal by the National Science Investigation Agency at the court below, the defendant's writing and seal mentioned in the loan certificate at issue, the letter of name, address, resident registration number, etc. on the paper at issue are deemed to have been written or sealed directly. The seal affixed and the defendant's seal on the certificate of personal seal impression are highly likely to be affixed. The seal affixed and the seal affixed are deemed to have been affixed directly on the paper attached to the application for ownership transfer registration, and even if the seal affixed to the document at the court below is proved to have not been observed.