beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BP car.
On July 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car on July 8, 2015, and proceeded ahead of the D cafeteria located in Daegu Suwon-gu C from the right side of the commercial street to the right side of the commercial street.
At the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went into operation as it is, while driving, destroyed the central separation zone in an amount equivalent to 200 million won of the repair cost by being driven by the Defendant at the front part of the vehicle in front of the said vehicle managed by the Daegu Suwon-gu Office, which is the victim, and escaped without stopping and taking necessary measures, and leaving the said vehicle alone at the site.
2. The Defendant, while operating a car at the same time and at the same place as above in paragraph (1) above, called “E, who was divorced from criminal punishment for traffic accidents, and asked the Defendant to report that he was involved in the accident while driving the car on behalf of the Defendant, and caused the said E to commit the crime.
Accordingly, at around 01:20 on the same day, E made a false statement as if he caused a traffic accident while driving the said vehicle to G, a police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the Daegu Suwon Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report at the above site of the traffic accident.
Accordingly, the defendant instigated the above E to escape the defendant who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to E.