beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 55,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from November 21, 2013 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a person operating a sales business of telecommunications equipment, such as mobile phones devices, with the trade name of “D” in Daegu-gu, and the Defendant is a person operating the SK Telecom Agent (FF Daegu Agent) in Daegu-gu.
B. On March 12, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a consignment contract with the Defendant on consignment with the content that the Defendant will sell the Defendant’s mobile phone devices and receive certain fees from the Defendant.
C. Of the consignment sales fees to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff under the above consignment sales contract, the portion unpaid until the date of the closing of the instant argument is KRW 12,104,40,00 for October 1, 2012, KRW 38,102,70 for November 38, 2012, and KRW 6,618,90 for December 2012.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of e-mail verification by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay 55,00,000 won (=12,104,400 won, KRW 38,102,700 won, KRW 6,618,900), which is the day following the delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case, to the day of complete payment, 20% interest per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from November 21, 2013 to the day of complete payment, barring special circumstances.
3. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion is not sufficient to recognize the defendant's argument, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it as otherwise, since there are a considerable number of products sold by the plaintiff through abnormal methods, such as the theft of name, etc., among the products entrusted by the plaintiff, the fee should not be paid and the fees already paid should be refunded.
4. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is accepted on the grounds of the reasoning.