beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally committed against the Plaintiff KRW 30,671,075 and Defendant A with respect thereto from December 26, 2014.
Reasons
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendants: (a) on March 14, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendants supplied mobile phones to the Defendants; and (b) entrusted sales contracts under which the Defendants entrusted the Defendants to their customers and receive fees from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant consignment contract”).
)을 체결하였는데, 이 사건 위탁판매계약에 의하면 위탁자인 원고가 판매정책을 정하는 것으로 되어 있다. 2) 원고가 2010. 11. 30. 에스케이네트웍스 주식회사와 체결한 휴대전화 위탁판매계약에 의하면 원고는 위 회사가 지정한 가격으로만 판매하여야 하는 것으로 정해져 있고, 원고가 2012. 9. 1. 주식회사 포예스와 체결한 휴대전화 위탁판매계약에 의하면 주식회사 포예스가 판매정책을 정하는 것으로 정해져 있으며, 원고가 2012. 9. 24. 주식회사 모바일꼬레아(이하 ‘모바일꼬레아’라 한다)와 체결한 휴대전화 위탁판매계약에 의하면 ‘고객의 판매조건(판매금액, 위약금, 약정 등)은 KT의 판매 약관기준에 따른다’고 정해져 있다.
3) The Plaintiff was supplied with mobile phones from the above companies and supplied them again to the Defendants. The Defendants sold 81 mobile phone units supplied by the Plaintiff from around that time to September 2013 to the customers with a 36-month installment, and “if a customer pays a device in installments for 18 months or longer, the remainder of the device installment is exempted without any condition or subsidized the relevant amount” (hereinafter “instant sales terms”).
4) Since then, 81 customers who purchased a mobile phone from the Defendants from March 7, 2012 to September 4, 2013 who purchased the mobile phone from the Defendants are customers listed in A No. 23 (C civil petition treatment case).
For the reason that 18 months have elapsed during the installment period, the Plaintiff demanded the termination of the mobile phone subscription contract or the change of equipment to the mobile operator, and the Plaintiff is above.