The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant of the public hall in the public hall was at around 14:00 on May 14:0, 2017, in the lecture room for the study hall for the “D Private Teaching Institutes” located on the fifth fifth floor in the C commercial building in the city, the Defendant referred to the victim E who was the chief director of the above commercial building before the management of the commercial building in the place where approximately 20 persons exist for the formation of the organization of the C commercial hall. In order to the organization of the C commercial hall, the Defendant was suffering from a saw that he was aware of the fact that there was a natural disaster, and the former president and the former president were wrong.

“The purpose of this,” and the occupant merchant’s “for example, what mistake was made.”

“The same type of r.e., advertisement”;

It is also necessary to receive personal money.

(b) It is required that there was a hidden storage unit subsequent to (a).

Until the end of us, we have a marincul, and time is needed on the increase.

For this purpose, this construction repair work is required to be completed, to be well-grounded, a few hundred million units of repair work.

(b) the last hidden pressure after the Tymar (comfore)

Hays (come.) Nowwsskys 10 won;

Inasmuch as it is not possible to retire from the position of free service, even if you want to do so, the victim’s reputation was damaged by pointing out false facts as if he intentionally delayed the repair work by having the victim and the former president receive back money and advertised the specific company, and intentionally delayed the repair work.

2. Determination:

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Submission of a self-agreement on June 4, 2018;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;