logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.02 2016고단7003
건조물침입
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:0, around 200, the Defendant, at around 57, went into the Central Commercial Building 2nd, female toilets on May 3, 201, which had been managed by the victim’s name and influence; (b) and (c) was influenced in the way that women entering the said toilets were able to divated and hidden in the said toilets.

2. On June 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 13:51, 13:51, and around 2, 2016, the 13:51, the 13:51, Osan-si Roro 91, which was managed by the victim’s name, was placed in the female toilets on the 1st floor of apartment commercial building; and (b) in mind, women entering the said 1st floor were able to string the string, and intruded with the method of hiding the string door in the said st

3. From around 20:02 to 20:31 on September 8, 2016, the Defendant came to a female toilet on the second floor of the Central 3rd commercial buildings in which the victim’s name and influence as indicated in the preceding paragraph “1” was influenced by the Defendant, and, in view of the fact, women entering the said toilet were influencesing the lusium, they went to a lusium and intruded into the said toilet in a way that they are hidden and hidden therein.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A simplified statement of C;

1. Report on internal investigation (as to the confirmation of CCTV at the place of crime);

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and investigation report (as to the attachment and analysis of suspect mobile phone digital evidence analysis replies) statute;

1. Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is for the first offense without the criminal records of the defendant, and both of the errors are recognized and against all.

The defendant's family members are under the guidance and protection of the defendant with disabilities of class III of intellectual disability, and the age of the defendant.

arrow